November 28, 2025

Did you know vacant land supply can quietly destroy your capital growth?

This blog shows how vacant land supply, both within a suburb and in nearby areas, can significantly reduce capital growth, backed by thirty years of national sales data. It explains why the impact varies depending on how close a suburb is to a major city and uses real case studies to illustrate how excess land supply has caused long periods of underperformance. The summary also outlines the practical checks investors can use to avoid these supply risks and protect long term growth.

Expert Tips

Did you know vacant land supply can quietly destroy your capital growth?

Most investors have heard that “too much development” hurts prices — but almost nobody can quantify it.

I can.
After analysing every bought-and-sold property in Australia for the past 30 years, I’ve been able to put real numbers behind this effect — and they’re bigger than most people expect.

If you want the full charts, examples, and methodology, I’ve put everything into a clear explainer video.

The Key Finding

Looking at five-year periods of sales:

  • Suburbs with <0.1% vacant land sales
    Outperform the national average by +1.5% per year

  • Suburbs with ≥20% vacant land sales
    Underperform by –2% per year

That gap compounds into tens—or even hundreds—of thousands of dollars over time.

And it’s not just the suburb itself…

The 7 km Radius Effect

Even if your suburb has low land supply, being within 7 km of an area that’s releasing lots of land reduces your growth.

Supply doesn’t just affect the suburb it’s in — it affects the whole region around it.

Why the Effect Changes With Distance From a CBD

Close to a major city:

  • Amenities are already maxed out

  • New supply competes directly with existing homes

  • Extra land = extra downward pressure

But 150 km or more from a CBD, new development often increases amenity, making the town more attractive and boosting long-term growth.

Context matters just as much as quantity.

Two Real-World Case Studies

1. Bulgarra, WA

2011–2014: ~20% of all sales were vacant land
→ Existing homes underperformed the national average by ~20%
→ Recovery only began once land supply dried up
→ Same pattern appears in other WA mining towns

2. Geraldton, WA

2010–2013: another ~20% land-sale period
→ Growth collapsed into the –3% to –5% per year range
→ Even when land sales dropped to ~15%, recovery took years

Both examples are charted clearly in the explainer video.

Why This Happens

It’s simple supply vs demand:

  1. More land → more new houses

  2. Buyers shift attention to new builds

  3. Existing homes face increased competition

  4. Demand thins out

  5. Price growth slows — or reverses

  6. Effect lasts until the excess supply is absorbed

This pattern repeats everywhere the numbers are high.

How to Protect Your Capital Growth

✔️ 1. Check the proportion of vacant land sales

<5% is fine.

10% is caution.
≥20% is a major risk signal.

✔️ 2. Check the surrounding suburbs (7 km rule)

Your suburb might be fine — its neighbours might not.

✔️ 3. Ask agents about upcoming land releases

They rarely volunteer the information.

✔️ 4. Favour constrained-supply areas

This is one major reason Sydney structurally outperforms Melbourne:
Sydney has no spare land.

✔️ 5. Don’t trust raw median price growth

Areas with lots of new builds often show fake growth that doesn’t apply to existing homes.
I’ll have a dedicated video on this soon.

Recommended for you